Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+antenna\s+advise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+antenna\s+advise\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise (score: 1): Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:15:46 +0000; I'm starting to think about antenna work this summer and one of the items on my list of improvements is my 160M capability. I have 2 150' towers on my property that are 192' apart and lined up at abo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00120.html (7,483 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:29:40 -0600 (CST); i have two inverted L's spaced 1/2 wave with radials raised about 10'. it is nice because just by switching in a half wave phasing line you can switch from broadside to endfire. I'm starting to think; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00121.html (7,691 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:24:56 -0800; I like K1TTT's comments. But -- those grounded towers will interact with anything you put up, so be sure to include them in an NEC model. If the only ground for these towers are some rods, I'd add a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00123.html (8,741 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M antenna advise (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:21:13 -0600; Guy, I think a horizontal antenna at that low height relative to the frequency might be a waste of time. If you have the room and can go out far enough with ropes, I would go one step farther and put; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00128.html (8,778 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]