- 1. [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 03:01:04 +0000 (GMT)
- I am very fortunate to have a number of long Beverages for 160m receive. These work very well for DX, but during CQWW last weekend I realised that they are much too directional for running the US - i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00835.html (7,323 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:30:39 -0500
- VE3ZI: (1) A short Beverage - perhaps 300'; (2) A single K9AY; (3) A single flag; (4) A single EWE. Roger I would add a low dipole or inv-V to your list. It will work very well within 3-400 miles of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00000.html (6,304 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:15:02 +0000
- VE3ZI: (1) A short Beverage - perhaps 300'; (2) A single K9AY; (3) A single flag; (4) A single EWE. None of the above Put up a low dipole for that close in stuff. (And, the short Beverage will just n
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00002.html (7,343 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:43:08 +0000 (GMT)
- Many thanks to all who replied both on the list and privately. Several suggested a low dipole as an alternative. That antenna I already have and whilst it does work well it is more or less omni-direc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00042.html (8,808 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:51:59 +0100
- Hi Roger, I use 3 short beverages as well, length are two with 45m, the other 60m. I found them always very useful on 160m and 80m as well during the contests. Either I hear two different stations Q5
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00043.html (9,097 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "John Wagner" <jwagner@dxengineering.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:54:38 -0500
- The Receive Four Square using active antennas is also worth looking at. www.dxengineering.com 73, John W8JJW _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00044.html (8,997 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:43:41 -0800 (PST)
- On 160 meters, several thousand feet is only a handfull of wavelengths. I can show you plenty of locations several thousand feet from anything that have lots of power line noise. My own vertical is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00047.html (8,879 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu