Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+antenna\s+$was\s+bonding\s+to\s+AC\s+box$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+antenna\s+$was\s+bonding\s+to\s+AC\s+box$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m antenna (was bonding to AC box) (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:31:50 -0500; I would use a vertical on 160m. Another option is a vertical dipole with the ends bend away from the tower making a C shape. John KK9A <snip> And not to change the subject but can i get an opinion fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00270.html (7,751 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m antenna (was bonding to AC box) (score: 1): Author: John Nistico <electric911inc@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:43:04 -0500; thanks john i was thinking vertical Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-01/msg00271.html (8,168 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]