Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160meter\s+half\s+sloper\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160meter\s+half\s+sloper\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 03:21:37 +0100; Well, I am at it again, trying to re-invent the wheel. In looking through some old qst's last night (cable was out) I found an article about a 160 meter half sloper that used inductive loading at the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00485.html (8,775 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:58:07 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> If the sloper is attached to the correct point on the tower, very little radiation takes place from the sloper wire itself. So inductive loading to shorten this wire is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00507.html (11,572 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:46:57 -0400; Hi Eric, I don't understand that statement Eric. The loading inductor is in series with one terminal of the coax. How can it not add loss? Loss in a loading component has nothing to do with radiation; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00516.html (8,141 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 04:13:29 -0700; Hi Mike. A few months back, CQ had an article about a sloper with a top hat at the bottom. Don't know if you saw it or not, but the sloper came down to a mast on the ground, and on top of the mast wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00520.html (7,971 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: gareth@capecod.net (Gareth Crispell); Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 01:22:50 -0400; Hi everyone Does anyone know what month this appeared in? de ... N1MSV (gary) Gareth http://www.capecod.net/~gareth -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00524.html (8,429 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 09:03:37 -0700; Hi Tom, Please note that I said that "unless the inductor is quite lossy". The point being that shortening the sloper wire absent the introduction of excessive loss in the loading element will not mu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00537.html (9,553 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: spelunk.sueno@mci2000.com (spelunk.sueno); Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 11:57:27 -0400; QST, March, 1998, pp. 54-56. -Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: Gareth Crispell <gareth@capecod.net> To: w7why@mail.coos.or.us <w7why@mail.coos.or.us> Cc: Mike <no6x@inreach.com>; towertalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00539.html (9,393 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 160meter half sloper (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 21:01:32 -0400; Hi Eric, Understood now. 73 Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: ow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00557.html (7,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]