Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+204BA\s+NEW\s+Beta\s+vs\s+OLD\s+Beta\s+match\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+204BA\s+NEW\s+Beta\s+vs\s+OLD\s+Beta\s+match\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 204BA NEW Beta vs OLD Beta match (score: 1): Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ@aol.com); Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 18:15:14 -0400 (EDT); I am sending this message to both the Towertalk newsgroup reflector and Telex Hygain, .... Is there any reason for concern in my updating the Beta match on a older 204BA to the newer version? Telex H; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00176.html (8,105 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 204BA NEW Beta vs OLD Beta match (score: 1): Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK); Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 19:34:23 -0400; As near as I can tell, the reason for the new beta is to allow adjustment for the "174CA Option," a set dimensions for operation of the antenna on 17 Meters. According to my (new) 204BA manual, the "; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00177.html (8,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]