Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4\s+port\s+network\s+analyzers\s+for\s+balun\s+measurements\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Daniel Danny Horvat" <danny.e73m@myantennas.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 11:22:57 -0500
You should fixture the balun under test on a ground plane with 4 connectors grounded to that plane. The 4 analyzer cables go to these connectors. You don't connect anything from the DUT to the groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00211.html (8,123 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:50:20 -0800
Just my $0.02 Danny E73M This is a good point. If the cores are sitting close to a ground plane will the small asymmetries between the conductors in the bifilar turns and the ground plane be large en
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00212.html (7,987 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:47:50 -0800
Just my $0.02 Danny E73M This is a good point. If the cores are sitting close to a ground plane will the small asymmetries between the conductors in bifilar turns and the ground plane be large enough
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00214.html (8,804 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:36:51 -0800
On 11/21/15 9:50 AM, Michael Tope wrote: On 11/21/2015 8:22 AM, Daniel Danny Horvat wrote: Placing an "open" wound 2.4" toroid BALUN on/near a ground plane will affect the real performance of that BA
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00215.html (10,561 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 05:27:51 -0800
On 11/21/2015 10:36 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 11/21/15 9:50 AM, Michael Tope wrote: On 11/21/2015 8:22 AM, Daniel Danny Horvat wrote: Placing an "open" wound 2.4" toroid BALUN on/near a ground plane will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00219.html (11,642 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 port network analyzers for balun measurements (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:53:32 +0000
Unfortunately that test doesn't subject the balun to the maximum CM stress it might experience in a typical application - at worst it subjects the balun to a CM voltage equal to the full differential
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00220.html (9,452 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu