Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\s+mtr\s+dipole\s+spacing\s+above\s+tribander\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 22:14:07 -0800
I have been looking though the archives in tower talk for info and haven't found anything as yet about my spacing question. I also emailed Force 12 but haven't received a response yet. I have a Force
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00105.html (10,387 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:48:18 -0500
Bob: FWIW: I have my D40 about 11 feet above my Skyhawk which is eerily similar in design to the open sleeve feeds of F12 Yagis. The elements of both antennas are parallel with no adverse effects, i.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00106.html (11,584 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 23:06:55 -0800
Gene, Thats good to hear. With no noticeable interaction at 11 foot spacing and elements parallel, I may be able to space closer with the dipole oriented parallel to the C3 boom. Theres hope for me y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00107.html (12,225 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Scott & Sherry Souva" <ssouva@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:23:41 -0500
?Bob, I have a D40 sitting about 5 feet above my Tennadyne T-6 on a TX-455 tower. The D40 elements are parallel to the T-6 elements and I have not detected any issues with either antenna. The D40 is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00109.html (11,421 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 08:02:23 -0800
Scott, Thats very good to hear. I didn't want to space them any more than necessary. 5 feet would be excellent. Thanks for the info, much appreciated ! Bob K6UJ ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00110.html (12,319 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:02:59 -0700
The D40 is not resonant on 10, 15 or 20 meters, so the dipole should be ok parallel to the C3. I have a 40-2CD six feet above a KT-34XA, elements parallel, and all is ok. Those antennas have been the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00111.html (11,700 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 mtr dipole spacing above tribander (score: 1)
Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:10:11 -0800
Dave, Good info on testing for interaction Dave ! I will check the F/B before and after as you describe. thanks, Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00126.html (12,275 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu