Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+402\-CD\s+vs\.\s+EF\-240X\s+\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+402\-CD\s+vs\.\s+EF\-240X\s+\-Reply\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X -Reply (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 11:14:08 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Discussing quads VS, yagis is often like discussing voo doo or other occult sciences. As far as I know, the following is correct: 1.) Antennas develop directivity by fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00019.html (11,278 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: 30 Apr 1998 12:33:59 Z; And in my unscientific observations, having had yagis and now a 5-band, 2 element quad, I will be hard pressed to ever fool with yagis again (in my current qth, anyway). The quad is much quieter, in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00967.html (12,292 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X -Reply (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 10:25:43 +0000; Hi Jim, I wouldn't give up on yagi's for that reason, especially if there isn't something making noise right below the antenna. Perhaps your yagi had a defect in element balance, allowing the tower a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00975.html (9,241 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X -Reply (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 17:12:06 -0400 (EDT); Jim, what brand of quad do you have that you like so much?? K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-R; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg01003.html (8,295 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 402-CD vs. EF-240X -Reply (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 17:20:07 -0400 (EDT); Actually, from field experience, quads are better than beams, in less noise, more gain per # of elements, larger capture area, lower angle radiation, etc. But, yes they are a bear to put up and keep; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg01006.html (8,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]