Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+Yagi\s+recommendations\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: k3nc@earthlink.net (Neal Campbell-Sarah Ferrell)
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 10:10:15 -0500
Sorry for wasting bandwidth if there is already a good submission for this! I have searched and not found anything recent in this category. I am looking to put up a 2 ele 40m yagi 10' above my CC X9.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00409.html (7,884 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: wa6znm@jps.net (James Sawyer)
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 22:00:01 -0800
Go with the Cush Craft. I have the older one and it works great above my TH6DXX Jim --Original Message-- From: owner-towertalk@contesting.com [mailto:owner-towertalk@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Neal
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00455.html (8,707 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:10:29 -0800
Look a little deeper into the issue. The "older one" (40-2CD) is not the same as the XM240. There have been reports here on TT of the CC XM240 not being a worthy successor. I have a 40-2CD and love i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00469.html (8,663 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: la5he@yahoo.no (ragnar otterstad)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:49:04 +0100 (CET)
40-2CD was electrically a good antenna but the mechanical part was lousy. The Upgrade available from a W9.... ( dont remember) is a must. 73 Rag _____________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00470.html (8,323 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: sales@radiosonline.com (Scott Bullock)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 05:29:32 -0500
HUH? I have had a xm240 for over a year now, and can tell you that 1. it is a much better built antenna, 2. It is a much BEEFIER antenna, 3. It works the same if not better than a regular 402cd. Whoe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00472.html (9,970 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: radio_9k2ub@yahoo.com (mohammad almutairi)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 03:09:09 -0800 (PST)
My CC XM-240 which was only installed a couple of months ago outperformed the older model CC 40-2CD which is owned by another local ham during an on air signal comparison (Same power & height)with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00473.html (11,976 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] 40M Yagi recommendations (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:21:33 EST
What other antennas are on the mast? What spacing? Many XM240 users are experiencing swr degradation and destructive interaction with antennas like the TH11 and other tribanders even at 10 feet or mo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00476.html (8,216 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu