Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+6061\-T8\.\.\.\s+new\s+alloy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+6061\-T8\.\.\.\s+new\s+alloy\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 6061-T8... new alloy (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 05:40:03 -0700; I noticed on DX eng's site that they sell boom material, made from 6061-T8. Now this T8 version I had not heard of. It's a full 10 ksi stonger [in yield strength] VS 6061-T6. That equates to 28.6% st; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00150.html (7,415 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 6061-T8... new alloy (score: 1): Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:27:56 -0400; Huh? Does not compute, as they are both the same alloy, just different tempers The ASM pages for both show the same yield and ultimate strengths, but different hardnesses http://asm.matweb.com/search; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00160.html (8,043 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 6061-T8... new alloy (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:35:44 -0400; It's a whole lot easier to make a relatively small 3 roller swedge as you only need to reduce about 6 or 8" of the OD at one end by about 0.003 inch for the next size to fit. Of course the typical re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00163.html (10,291 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 6061-T8... new alloy (score: 1): Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:00:13 -0400; 6061-T8 is not a new alloy, but a relatively new temper. 6061-T6: Solution heat treated and then artificially aged. Mechanical property limits not affected by cold working. Most alloys in the -w and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00169.html (10,071 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]