Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+4\-SQR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+4\-SQR\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: n5tw@igg-tx.net (Tom Whiteside); Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 08:44:49 -0500; With all the discussions on 4-Squares, thought I'd mention another approach featured in ON4UN's book and previously written up by K3LR in QST. The alternative I use is an array of 4 80M dipoles suspe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00010.html (8,012 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: goodnews@mail.cmedic.net (Donald E. Stiles); Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 11:03:34 -0400; Hi Tom, I follow the discussions on the 4 Square on the TT, and I am looking for books on building Aerials . The alternative I wish to use is an array of 3 160M dipoles suspended from 3- 60' towers o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00014.html (8,528 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: goodnews@mail.cmedic.net (Donald E. Stiles); Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 16:55:59 -0400; Eric and TTers, The 4-SQU has four sides. I am thinking of a Delta loop having three sides. In my back yard I have a pond that is an equalateral triangle. Now, the wire antenna(s). I have three 60 fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00055.html (10,980 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: kcl@bwn.net (Kathy London); Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 20:49:26 -0600; I believe that a dipole-based 4-square, such as described by K3LR will work well. However, it is worth noting that K3LR has added a 2 element 80 meter rotatable yagi to his arsenal. Clearly, the 4-sq; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00065.html (8,989 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 12:12:05 +0100; Hey, no surprise. If you can get a horizontal yagi up 3/4 wavelength or so, there's up to 6 dB of ground reflection gain free for the taking, and the take-off angle comes right down to what the four-; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00072.html (8,067 bytes)
6. Fw: [TowerTalk] 80M 4-SQR (score: 1): Author: n5tw@igg-tx.net (Tom Whiteside); Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 06:58:24 -0500; No question that a high 80M beam would win but I can sure turn my wire array faster - hi... I figure that the wire array improved my 80M dipole performance by about 10dB which puts a Texan working Eu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00083.html (7,984 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]