Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+antenna\s+for\s+KJ7CU\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80M\s+antenna\s+for\s+KJ7CU\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 80M antenna for KJ7CU (score: 1): Author: "Mark ." <n1lo@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:27:12 -0400; Richard, I'm replying to the group so we can all participate.... low-angle, omnidirectional antenna. I think pursuing a vertical arrangement, as already suggested, would work well, especially since y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00823.html (7,973 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80M antenna for KJ7CU (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:20:15 -0400; to me you'd need a vertical arrangement, you already have a I'll go along with Mark, and add a warning. If you hang an 80M Inverted Veee dipole or sloper from the tower it'll screw up the gamma feed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00824.html (8,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]