Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+rotatable\s+dipole\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: henry@pacinfo.com (henry gillow-wiles); Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:40:05 -0800; I have a chance to put a 80m roto dipole on the big tower. It will have to go some where on 18ft of mast along with a CC shorty 40 and a 4 ele DX engineering 20m. Right now the 20m is at the top of t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00490.html (7,743 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 80m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:27:16 -0500 (EST); Answer... model it. I'm in the process of modelling interaction between antennas on DIFFERENT towers. Seperation of as much as 180'. I still see interaction. Some worse than others depending on the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00495.html (8,009 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 80m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: KJ6Y@aol.com (KJ6Y@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 19:15:32 EST; I have my 75/80 rotatable dipole between the two anteenas on about 18 ft of mast. After first haveing it the same direction as the beams there was significant interaction on the KT-34XA. I rotated th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00509.html (7,294 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 80m rotatable dipole (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 22:36:47 -0600; Placing the 80M dipole parallel to the booms of the other antennas is a GOOD IDEA. It would take a 40M reflector and director on at least a 48 ft boom to resonate a boom at 80M. As long as the other; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00515.html (7,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]