Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+AB\-105\s+ratings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+AB\-105\s+ratings\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] AB-105 ratings (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:10:31 -0400; I have a chance to pick some new old surplus at a great price. How does it compare to 45G as far as wind loading, torque and guy spacing? These appear to have been assembled in 60' sections with guy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00092.html (6,888 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] AB-105 ratings (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:19:48 -0400 (EDT); Hi Carl, AB-105C strength should be about midway between Rohn 55 and 65. As a rough approximation, the relative strength of a well engineered tower is a mainly a function of face width and weight per; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00102.html (9,252 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] AB-105 ratings (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:26:39 -0400 (EDT); Carl, You can learn more than you ever wanted to know about AB-105 by using Google to search the towertalk archives. Its a much more powerful search capability than the search tool provided on contes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00103.html (7,164 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] AB-105 ratings (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:20:31 -0400; Thanks for the details and link Frank. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00108.html (8,222 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]