Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ALL\s+THE\s+RIGHT\s+ANGLES\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ALL\s+THE\s+RIGHT\s+ANGLES\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 07:17:19 -0600; ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? YES and NO ! N6BV used 100 ft elevation for his 80, 40 and 20 meter models, and 60 ft elevation for 10 and 15 meters, at both ends of the path. Such elevations have pattern NUL; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00289.html (11,920 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 11:02:38 -0400; Great Tom! I'm glad you also caught the serious flaw in the method used! Too many people rely on flawed measurements for critical information! ..........and that would require a VERY tall tower even; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00296.html (8,447 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 11:21:33 -0400; Am I the only one who recalls N6BV explaining that he used thousands of IONCAP runs to develop the arrival angle data for "All the Right Angles?" I use the VOACAP version of IONCAP, and as far as I c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00298.html (8,987 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 16:00:34 -0400; Hi Pete, I recall reading in early text angles were measured, not modeled. The measurements were with low height ~70 ft antennas. under be stronger. That is certainly the point everyone should agree; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00306.html (8,796 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 16:30:02 -0400; Just 2 comments: First, of course the predictions are just that, and have only statistical validity. They probably won't describe the actual situation if you could measure it at any given time, which; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00307.html (8,863 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 22:52:42 -0600; On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 11:21:33 -0400 Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> writes: .......................................... N4KG reply: On page 23-21 of the 18th edition of the ARRL Antenna Book, N6BV dis; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00315.html (12,814 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 23:12:35 -0600; On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 16:30:02 -0400 Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> writes: .................................................................................. N4KG comments on Propagation Prediction; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00325.html (10,630 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] ALL THE RIGHT ANGLES ? (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 19:12:16 +0100; Ioncap requires that you specify the entire transmitting and receiving antenna system, and then it shows the parameters (snr, takeoff angle, etc) for the strongest propagation mode for that antenna s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00355.html (9,840 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]