Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Alternate\s+method\,\s+PL\-259\s+on\s+RG\-8\-type\s+coax\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:31:36 -0600
I read through an extensive, several-years-old archived thread the other day, -- somewhere, maybe on QRZ.com -- on UHF vs. N-type connectors. While the recent discussion of UHF connector loss at vari
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00634.html (9,803 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:05:39 -0700
My experience.... The braid would break when being screwed (don't we all!). The braid also performs the duties of mechanically holding the coax. Some engineer was paid BIG bucks to come up with the "
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00636.html (12,442 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:15:24 -0400
At 12:05 PM 4/29/2004 -0700, Dino Darling wrote: I've said it before...check out CableXperts! They are really doing it right with the right equipment!!! The problem I have with CableXperts is that th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00637.html (8,527 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:53:20 +0000
I've tried this and found that the screwing action also serves to cut the shield wires. Been some time, but I seem to remember at least 1/2 the shield just cut off and left inside the shell. 73 Ed As
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00640.html (8,306 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: "j.a.hermans" <j.a.hermans@skynet.be>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:19:35 +0200
I very often used this method but withourt soldering at all. You should use the right PLs, those where the internal thread has no sharp edge so it cannot cut the bread. I never used this method on ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00652.html (12,664 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:53:44 -0400
I don't like it. On many types of coax, the threads can barely be screwed over the jacket alone. If you wedge the shield braid in between, it will be shredded as you screw the connector on. 73, Dick
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00658.html (12,344 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:07:32 -0400
I've seen it done and I don't like it either. It makes for a poor mechanically sound connection and provides another way for water to get into the braid. It's also a good way to get corrosion in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00663.html (14,031 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type coax (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:18:18 -0700
I use a similar method here where I solder the braid not through the four holes, but at the rear end of the connector. When trimming the braid prior to inserting the coax into the connector, I cut it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00690.html (10,060 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu