Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Alternative\s+Method\s+of\s+Tower\s+Guying\(Correction\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: tsharar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
My apologies to all. I did not realize that the Tower Talk reflector does not forward e-mail attachments. I will see if I can find a work around for this problem. 73 de Terry Sharar -- Original Messa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00346.html (8,467 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: tsharar@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Many thanks to VE4XT. 73 de Terry Sharar W3EDS -- Original Message -- My apologies to all. I did not realize that the Tower Talk reflector does not forward e-mail attachments. I will see if I can fin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00347.html (9,520 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Noel <tnoel@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:05:46 -0700
As drawn in the diagram, the resultant force vector to the tower top will be as if the guy line ran directly straight to the roof. MUST the anchor point be back under the eve? There is no advantage o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00348.html (12,010 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:21:52 -0400
You didnt specify the wind loading of the DSTAR repeater antenna you intend to put atop this tower, but I have three comments: 1. Depending on the antenna wind load in combination with the zoning req
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00349.html (12,577 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 20:36:02 -0400
Don't forget that those guying forces plus are transferred to the base of the tower (roof) when the tower is self supporting. A guyed tower spreads the force over a wide area and the forces add algeb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00355.html (13,629 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:47:51 -0400
All the more reason they need to engage a Professional Engineer. Its possible they shouldnt even be _walking_ on the roof Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00356.html (10,370 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Alternative Method of Tower Guying(Correction) (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 03:13:41 -0400
Yup! Particularly if it's someone else s roof! <:-)) 73 Roger (K8RI) Don't forget that those guying forces plus are transferred to the base of the tower (roof) when the tower is self supporting. A gu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-09/msg00357.html (11,260 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu