Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Analyzer\s+Suggestions\:\s+Conclusions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+Analyzer\s+Suggestions\:\s+Conclusions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions: Conclusions (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:16:12 +0000; I have received several suggestions as to which Analyzer I should get. I thought I would share my feeble analysis with everyone. AIM 4170: While a nice bench instrument, it is not suitable for field; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00153.html (7,695 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions: Conclusions (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:13:15 -0700; I have a 269 and 259 and the work pretty well. I try to avoid that brand for most everything else. Autek research has an analyzer too. I have the HF and VHF versions. I prefer the MFJ units. "A slip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00160.html (9,231 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions: Conclusions (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:40:16 -0500; Hey.... All is not lost !! If you decide to keep the old standby... that means you have SAVED HUNDREDS of dollars.... which means you CAN BUY something else... some other little shack accessory... or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00171.html (7,991 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Antenna Analyzer Suggestions: Conclusions (score: 1): Author: "Phil & Debbie Salas" <dpsalas@tx.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:39:20 -0600; "AA-200: Nice and portable, BUT, the Blue on Green screen and the small Font size bother me. I haven't had one in my hand yet, so if I do get to do the "touchy-feely" test I may revise this." I just; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00172.html (7,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]