Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+surface\s+area\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+surface\s+area\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Antenna surface area (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:40:43 -0400; Or on the other hand you could get a copy of K7NV's Yagistress, which incorporates the latest thinking on the aerodynamics of Yagi antennas, as well as their mechanics. http://yagistress.freeyellow.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00194.html (9,055 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Antenna surface area (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:16:54 -0700; I would think you would want to consider the "worst case" situation when determining an antenna wind area. If the worst case is when the elements are broadside to the wind, then you would want to con; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00234.html (10,085 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Antenna surface area (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths); Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:33:38 -0700; I think John is being pretty generous with antenna manufacturers. I did a little research into my extensive files on antenna brochures from back as far as 30 years ago and found the following example; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00235.html (11,959 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Antenna surface area (score: 1): Author: eric@k3na.org (Eric Scace); Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:21:45 +0400; One point which Hank made has been unappreciated. Wind is not a laminar flow of air. It is highly turbulent at the scale we are dealing with. None of the calculations we are talking about have much t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00421.html (9,716 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]