Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+traps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+traps\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna traps (score: 1): Author: jcjacobsen via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 09:52:11 -0800; Jim, are these fan dipoles? I am not understanding how a loading coils will make a dipole work on two bands. John KK9A John and others: I've made MANY wire antennas using coils. In simple terms (whic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00014.html (7,319 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Traps (score: 1): Author: "James Wolf" <jbwolf@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:25:11 -0500; Not the fan dipole, but the loaded/trap Dipole. Jim - KR9U ** _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00015.html (6,954 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna traps (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 21:43:54 -0500; Thanks Jake. K9YC explained this to me in a private email. The loaded dipole is a decent dual band balanced antenna with a nice pattern. The 80/40 would be great to have on one of my contest expediti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00021.html (7,131 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna traps (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 17:17:50 -0500; I had the W9INN dipole for 40/80/160 with two sets of coils. The bandwidth on 80 and 160 was about 30 khz. Compared to a ladder line fed 80m dipole, the W9INN dipole was so much down on 80 and 160 th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-01/msg00024.html (8,861 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]