Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Antenna\s+wind\s+load\s+vs\s+tower\s+specs\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Walter <stevewalter90@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 08:36:41 -0400
Ive been casually planning my first tower for years and only recently discovered that Rohn guyed towers use EPA (effective projected area) spec and most antenna manufacturers use something else. What
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00301.html (7,885 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 06:56:29 -0700
On 4/29/18 5:36 AM, Steve Walter wrote: Ive been casually planning my first tower for years and only recently discovered that Rohn guyed towers use EPA (effective projected area) spec and most antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00302.html (8,933 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: <kstover@ac0h.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:11:55 -0500
I'm planning one now and am using the Projected Area number on the JK site. JK Mid-Tri = 16sqft JK 12/17 Jr = 7.8sqft (I use 8) JK 402T = 9.3sqft ( I use 9.5) 20 foot out the top 3" mast 5 sqft All t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00303.html (9,913 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: mike repinski via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 14:46:14 -0400
Is that 52.5 at the top of the tower or 20 foot above the top? I'm planning one now and am using the Projected Area number on the JK site. JK Mid-Tri = 16sqft JK 12/17 Jr = 7.8sqft (I use 8) JK 402T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00304.html (10,347 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:06:33 -0400
I have seen these depictions of the guy wires so low on the tower however I have never built or seen one done that way. Typically the top guys are somewhere on the last section. Personally - I like t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00305.html (8,253 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 17:53:02 -0400
The top star guy on my Rohn 65G with double bracing is around 18' below the top. This allows for my top H.B. 15m beam to turn 360 degrees and it has little interaction with the 40m and 20m beams on t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00306.html (8,179 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 18:17:16 -0400
I have two towers: 100 of Rohn 45 on a pier bin base plate and 130 of Rohn 45 on a pier bin base plate. The 100 Rohn 45 has FOUR 5L HG155CAs plus FOUR 5L HG105CAs with guying at the 30, 60, and 90 le
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00307.html (11,826 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 19:13:59 -0700
My largest tower is 142' of Rohn 65G double Phillystran 25k# guys at 62' and 122', 20' section above the top guys. It's partially in 100' trees and I wanted the tower to have a chance to win a tree f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00308.html (10,554 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Antenna wind load vs tower specs. (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:26:45 -0700
<I'm planning one now and am using the Projected Area number on the JK site. JK Mid-Tri = 16sqft JK 12/17 Jr = 7.8sqft (I use 8) JK 402T = 9.3sqft ( I use 9.5) 20 foot out the top 3" mast 5 sqft <All
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-04/msg00315.html (15,276 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu