Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BCI\s+to\s+analyzers\s+tuning\s+transmatches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BCI\s+to\s+analyzers\s+tuning\s+transmatches\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BCI to analyzers tuning transmatches (score: 1): Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ); Date: Wed Jan 29 18:17:35 2003; Re the problem with medium wave bc stations getting into swr analyzers being used to tune transmatches, I understand MFJ makes a filter just for this purpose. I've never used it (the 1 kw 1480 khz tx; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00553.html (7,432 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] BCI to analyzers tuning transmatches (score: 1): Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don K5AQ); Date: Wed Jan 29 21:22:28 2003; The MFJ unit is the 731 and it can be tuned to null the BC station. I have a 10KW AM station less than a mile from me so measurements are real fun, particularly on 160. The unit can be used with any; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00561.html (7,169 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] BCI to analyzers tuning transmatches (score: 1): Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don K5AQ); Date: Wed Jan 29 21:23:22 2003; P.S. The station is on 1620. K5AQ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00563.html (6,753 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] BCI to analyzers tuning transmatches (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (Dan); Date: Wed Jan 29 23:56:04 2003; Hi Don: One of the locals here(K7OX) tried the 731 and it didn't give him enough attenuation in his strong BCI environment. We finally used an MFJ noise bridge with a battery powered SW receiver and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00567.html (8,154 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]