Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Back\s+On\s+Topic\s+\-\-\s+Are\s+These\s+Parts\s+OK\s+for\s+a\s+Rohn\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn (score: 1)
Author: k4ydk@wpmedia.com (k4ydk)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 99 21:29:51 -0500
Rohn tower. If that many people have experienced that much 'shoddy' workmanship, I'll spend my money somewhere else. Thanks for the info, 73-Mike -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfa
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00180.html (7,343 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn (score: 1)
Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (Bill Wall)
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 05:27:06 -0500
Hi Mike, If you think Rohn is bad, look at the others. We found when purchasing new Rohn tower, delivered by their truck, we had no problem. The ends on any tower can be slightly bent by improper han
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00185.html (8,652 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Back On Topic -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:49:47 EST
Where would you spend it and what would you spend it on? If you need a guyed tower, Rohn is the 800 pound gorilla - there really isn't anything else competitive. While there are many other tower manu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00200.html (7,918 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu