Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Banishment\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Banishment\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:37:20 -0500; KK9A said "If the reason is really related to a Champion Radio dispute, it's just not right." The guy that was banished posted what he said was a copy of an e-mail to him from Steve K7LXC, that the r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00362.html (7,333 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:03:30 -0600; But what if it was NOT a true copy? Frankly, I find it hard to attribute that message to the Steve Morris K7LXC I'm familiar with here on TowerTalk. It just doesn't sound like him, and until Steve sa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00363.html (9,062 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: ny6dx@netscape.net; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:33:12 -0500; The person in question has not only tried to contact champion to get the right belt,but also sent the wrong one back UPS only to have it refused delivery.When does buiseness govern whom should be ban; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00366.html (11,325 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:30:37 -0600; Having read everything to date concerning this thread I have a few thoughts. 1. There is no way to be sure the original post and attached correspondence from K7LXC is genuine. There's now way to tell; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00368.html (8,677 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:31:29 -0600; At 08:33 PM 1/11/2005, you wrote: The person in question has not only tried to contact champion to get the right belt,but also sent the wrong one back UPS only to have it refused delivery. That was N; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00369.html (11,123 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:21:48 -0500; There are several issues here. 1) Someone has been banned from the reflector, purportedly because the administrator wasn't happy with the result of the transaction. If this is true, it was inappropri; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00370.html (12,044 bytes)
7. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:25:31 -0500; All this back-and-forth is way off topic but I've reached the tipping point and need to sound off ... TowerTalk is not a Champion Radio support forum and is not funded by Champion Radio. The individu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00371.html (9,494 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "K7HPH" <k7hph@access4less.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:47:27 -0700; Thanks for the insight Perry. Couldn't have figured it out without you... -- Original Message -- From: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net> To: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; "TowerTalk" <towertalk@; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00374.html (14,490 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "K7HPH" <k7hph@access4less.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:16:02 -0700; It is most certainly true that there are always two sides to every story. However, for we who have no grasp or firsthand knowledge of either side of that story to start taking positions and drawing a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00376.html (15,290 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:32:46 -0500; It certainly IS our business. There are allegations that the administrator acted dishonorably as a vendor. Since these services are advertised on this reflector, discussion of how what happened IS re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00378.html (10,045 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:15:51 -0500; Your gratuitous sarcasm certainly adds nothing of value. -- Original Message -- From: "K7HPH" <k7hph@access4less.net> To: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>; "TowerT; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00379.html (9,341 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: asciibaron@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:10:50 +0000; reading this drama brings into question the ability to speak freely on this reflector without reprisal from the moderator. as Steve has clearly stated, he banned someone as the only means of satisfac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00385.html (8,994 bytes)
13. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "W4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:11:41 -0500; Further, for the two individuals to drag their business dispute into public via this forum was inappropriate as well. 73, ... Joe, K4IK Amen. Enough of this tempest in a teapot. Jon Hamlet, W4ZW Case; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00387.html (8,964 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: Rick Scott <rickn7hj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:55:19 -0800; Is there any other tower list? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00388.html (9,476 bytes)
15. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Daron J. Wilson" <daron@wilson.org>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 06:51:35 -0800; this That is one of the jobs of a moderator. I hardly believe it is your God given right to speak whatever you wish on anyone else's forum. You are a guest here, act like one. the As I listen to you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00389.html (9,289 bytes)
16. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:05:07 -0500; Bill, "Get real," yourself. This reached the reflector due to the the banning of a formerly active reflector participant by Steve. The dispute did not reach the reflector until Steve chose to ban the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00392.html (10,246 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: Rick Scott <rickn7hj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:16:18 -0800; tower-speak@mailman.qth.net. I found an alternative ... Its not active at the moment ... very vew messages. But it is an alternative. I asked if there was an alternate reflector but it has not come t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00393.html (11,289 bytes)
18. RE: [TowerTalk] Banishment? (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:16:41 -0600; I would like to point out that this was NOT put on to the list by Steve. He only posted , recently, in response to MANY speculative bashes based on only one post from the "customer". Get real, here.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00402.html (10,630 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]