Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Base\s+for\s+Wilson\s+MT\-61\/US\s+Tower\s+MA\-550\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Base\s+for\s+Wilson\s+MT\-61\/US\s+Tower\s+MA\-550\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Base for Wilson MT-61/US Tower MA-550 (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope); Date: Tue May 20 08:21:45 2003; Our club recently acquired an old Wilson MT-61 tubular tower from an SK's estate. My friend was thinking of putting it up at his QTH in "house bracket" configuration, but needs to get some specificat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00251.html (7,749 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Base for Wilson MT-61/US Tower MA-550 (score: 1): Author: jeff.klein@hewitt.com (Jeff Klein); Date: Tue May 20 17:46:32 2003; I had the MT 61 up for many years Mike. However, I never put in the top section (belive it has 3 sections of tubing) so mine only went up about 41 ft and only needed one set of guys. I've also had a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00263.html (7,825 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Base for Wilson MT-61/US Tower MA-550 (score: 1): Author: eugenejensen@nyc.rr.com (Eugene Jensen); Date: Tue May 20 22:44:12 2003; Depends on how much one's like the house they currently call home. I am an electrician by trade. As a personal favor to a friend of mine, whose son has fell on hard times, myself and a master carpent; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00269.html (9,835 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Base for Wilson MT-61/US Tower MA-550 (score: 1): Author: W6yll@aol.com (W6yll@aol.com); Date: Wed May 21 19:55:09 2003; Mike, I have paperwork for MT 61A, which was up for about 20 yrs. I used a 24 inch by 72 inch base with 60 inch anchors. It was not anchored to the house. Call or send an e. mail and I will mail a co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00297.html (7,047 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]