Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Basic\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Basic\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Basic question (score: 1): Author: drboz@pacbell.net (Donald R. Bozarth); Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 13:41:56 -0700; It's time to get some aluminum up in the air, so I have been looking at various towers. I'm looking for something around 70', crank-up, freestanding, it will initially be used with an antenna with 8.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00104.html (7,300 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Basic question (score: 1): Author: dan@anwireless.com (Dan Simmonds); Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:07:29 -0400; Hi Don, That's a question likely to draw many answers. All towers today must meet the current TIA/EIA-222-F-1996 (soon to be TIA/EIA-222-G) structural standards. That's pretty much the bottom line. M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00107.html (8,750 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Basic question (score: 1): Author: ad6id@arrl.net (Tony); Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:33:51 -0700; Hi Don, When looking for towers, keep in mind that the building code is interested in the wind load at 70 mph while most tower ads specify wind load at 50 mph. You have to ask for the 70 mph figure.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00112.html (7,721 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]