- 1. [TowerTalk] Beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: k9yo@ix.netcom.com (K9YO- Cedrick Johnson)
- Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 11:22:50 -0500
- Hello GangAfter operating the WPX CW contest here, I sorta got fed up with my vertical.. Since i'm going off to college this fall, I was thinking abt buying a small tribander, and a piece of thick co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00391.html (7,438 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Beam suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: millscl@msx.upmc.edu (Mills, Chuck)
- Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 10:42:11 -0400
- If your talking about some portability and limited space, look into Modley's MINI-33 and/or the new compact beam from cushcraft (can't remember model now...) 73 es gud luck de Chuck W3YNI Hello GangA
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00398.html (8,365 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <k8jdc@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:11:28 -0400
- All, I have been doing some research on putting up what will really be my first beam and I'm looking for suggestions. Due to the possibility that I might be moving in the next year, I'm considering p
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00562.html (7,244 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Dino Darling <dino@k6rix.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:23:48 -0700
- If you want a SteppIr, get the SteppIr! It's pay me now or pay me later and the SteppIr is a great antenna so far! The only other two choices for a small beam would be the following (IMHO) 1. M2 KT34
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00568.html (9,579 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:53:15 -0000
- I remember the magazine article where Wayne Overbeck ran around Southern California measuring the gain/fb of various quad antennas. As his reference antenna, he used a HY-Gain TH-2 on a portable towe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00574.html (7,350 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:04:54 -0500
- If you know you're going to want a 3-el SteppIR, why not buy the 2-el SteppIR with plans to upgrade later? Buying the 2-el and then the 3-el upgrade kit later is going to cost more, but not as much a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00576.html (11,497 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:24:34 -0400 (EDT)
- Dave, Please provide some insight into what's important to you in your new antenna system, it will help many of us give you some really useful advice. For example: What about 17 and 12 meters? 17 met
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00581.html (10,133 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:40:41 -0400
- Didn't he write an article in Ham Radio Magazine about that? Does anyone remember what issue? Julio, W4HY I remember the magazine article where Wayne Overbeck ran around Southern California measuring
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00583.html (8,344 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Bozarth" <drboz@pacbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:39:35 -0700
- I agree with Frank. The Force 12 XR-5 (18' boom) covers all bands 20-10 (including WARC) and I have had great results with it at 62'. Don B W6DRB _______________________________________________ _____
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00587.html (11,816 bytes)
- 10. [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: <k8jdc@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:20:54 -0400
- Frank, That was my error to omit any references to my goals. Without writing a novel, I will make a few notes: - This is my first beam (excepting a homebrewed 20m Moxon that surprised me with its per
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00611.html (10,884 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:49:30 -0700
- <snip> I realize this is the *tower*talk list and not the amps list, but the 10 dB improvement in signal strength you'll get from an amp (assuming you're barefoot now) into your existing dipole is pr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00614.html (11,499 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu