Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Best\s+\'medium\'\s+beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Best\s+\'medium\'\s+beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Best 'medium' beam (score: 1): Author: kaiserdr@yahoo.com (Dave Kaiser); Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 05:39:56 -0700 (PDT); Anyone have any idea which is the 'best' performing 'medium-size' beam? I want to keep the weight and boom lenght reasonable, less than 100 pounds and 35 foot boom. I have a TH-11-DXX, but am researc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00630.html (7,830 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Best 'medium' beam (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:45:20 EDT; The Mosley Pro? Good grief. As far as the Force 12 antennas, you can use their 'net gain' figures to compare them with the antennas in our report since their figures basically corollate to our findin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00633.html (8,254 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Best 'medium' beam (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 10:58:25 -0400; Isn't this backwards? I thought that your protocol basically used what F12 has used for years for published gain figures. (Grin!) snip -- Jimmy Weierich, KG2AU <kg2au@stny.rr.com> Vestal, NY USA FN12; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00635.html (7,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]