Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Best\s+choices\s+for\s+27\'\s+height\s+limit\.\s+Suggestions\s+please\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Best\s+choices\s+for\s+27\'\s+height\s+limit\.\s+Suggestions\s+please\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please? (score: 1): Author: "Jesus Castro II" <kc6pmt@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:11:46 -0700; My dreams were crushed when I called the City Planning Office where Im going to build a station and the man said the height limit was 27'. The future site is a typical city lot. It looks like I can n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00488.html (8,303 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:18:40 -0500; Bring in dirt and build a mound at least 5 feet up from existing elevation. Put the 27 foot tower on top. Hopefully no one will notice and complain, but if they do, at least you will be legal. This w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00492.html (9,001 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Best choices for 27' height limit. Suggestions please? (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:18:31 -0400; First of all, don't quit. That height limit is quite possibly impermissible under PRB-1. I would check with ARRL for a Volunteer Counsel near you and talk with him or her. The hamlaw reflector (ham-l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00493.html (9,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]