Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beverage\s+on\s+Sloping\s+Ground\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beverage\s+on\s+Sloping\s+Ground\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Beverage on Sloping Ground (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 13:14:45 -0500; Am I correct in assuming that Beverage wires sloping downward from the feed point to the termination will work better than ones that slope upward? I have two places I would like to put bidirectional; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-08/msg00001.html (7,622 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage on Sloping Ground (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:42:25 -0700; Downward sloping Beverages will have a lower takeoff angle than upward sloping ones (assuming no high terrain in the foreground), but ANY Beverage benefits from the pattern discriminating against noi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-08/msg00002.html (8,043 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage on Sloping Ground (score: 1): Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 14:10:33 -0700; Chuck, I can't imagine a 2% slope would make much difference. I have two 500' Beverages in the mountains here and they drop off a good 100 feet. Or 20% slope. They work well both directions. Using th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2023-08/msg00003.html (8,367 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]