Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Beverage\s+termination\s+\-\s+Surge\s+Arrestor\s+selection\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Beverage termination - Surge Arrestor selection? (score: 1)
Author: "Drax Felton" <draxfelton@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:18:32 -0400
Would it be alright to protect the terminating resistor of a Beverage antenna, against lightning damage, by placing either one or both of these components in parallel with it? Would they cause a prob
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00294.html (7,789 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage termination - Surge Arrestor selection? (score: 1)
Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:10:44 -0400
I would think the gas tube would be ok, low shunt C and all that, but the MOV would likely be bad. I use dual-element gas tubes across the line on both ends of my bi-directional Beverages, and althou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00296.html (10,096 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Beverage termination - Surge Arrestor selection? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:49:36 -0400
I am using those Harris MOV's to protect my 12V DC lines. The spec sheet gives the capacitance of the device Mark N1UK _______________________________________________ ________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00297.html (10,484 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu