Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bracket\s+mount\s+to\s+house\s+25G\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Bracket\s+mount\s+to\s+house\s+25G\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Bracket mount to house 25G (score: 1): Author: "Gene Bigham" <jbigham2@kc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:50:05 -0600; Steve, I do not have a Rohn tower, rather an Aluma crank up tower. It is the smallest footprint they make for a 50 foot total height when extended tower. This makes the sections 25 foot tall. I have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00365.html (7,227 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Bracket mount to house 25G (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:11:20 EST; Unless you have the Rohn 25 in stock, I would recommend using stouter stuff like Rohn 55 which would allow you to get up to 60 feet with the bracketing at 28 feet. This stuff is easily erected in one; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00367.html (7,334 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Bracket mount to house 25G (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:31:55 -0500; I totally agree that using something huskier is an excellent idea -- in a "short" tower like 40, 50 or 60' you end up with something really stout. I've been advising (giving opinions and observations; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00373.html (9,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]