Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-3\s+VS\s+C\-3S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+C\-3\s+VS\s+C\-3S\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] C-3 VS C-3S (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 06:11:35 -0600; On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:36:00 -0500 "MAERTZ, A REID" <amaertz@oppd.com> writes: on 10 meters; also a higher swr on the C-3S on 12 meters (4:1 vs. 3.2:1). Makes sense to me. de N4KG Hi Reid, Both anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00054.html (9,604 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] C-3 VS C-3S (score: 1): Author: amaertz@oppd.com (MAERTZ, A REID); Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:36:00 -0500; Greetings to all: In researching Force-12 I note the stated difference between a C-3 and C-3S as a 1.5 mhz bandwidth on C-3 vs. a 1.1 mhz bandwidth on C-3S on 10 meters; also a higher swr on the C-3S; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00781.html (7,532 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] C-3 VS C-3S (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:31:37 EDT; Basically it means that you're really not giving anything up by using the smaller antenna. IMO you can't go wrong with either antenna. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00786.html (7,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]