Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CATV\s+hardline\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CATV\s+hardline\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CATV hardline (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 08:12:47 -0400; Does anyone know a reliable source for CATV hardline in long lengths at a reasonable (cheep) price? I need three 1800 foot lengths. I'd like to avoid multiple splices. What does a 5000 foot reel of n; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00301.html (7,043 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] CATV hardline (score: 1): Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 20:04:39 -0400; 1/2" jacketed runs around .35/ft. plus shipping, and reels average 4800'. Telewire (now part of Antec) is a good supplier. I'm not sure if they sell to non-accounts; I'd be happy to have some dropped; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00304.html (7,284 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: hires@mail.rust.net (Floyd Soo, W8RO); Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:23:10 +0000; Gang, I have heard that certain CATV hardlines are better than others for HF use on ham bands. It had something to do with if the hardline was made of copper or aluminum. I have never seen any copper; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00740.html (8,330 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart); Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:48:12 +0100; I've never heard that and have seen no evidence to support it. It's all good stuff and all is a copper clad aluminum center with an aluminum jacket. At HF there is almost no difference in loss...it's; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00755.html (9,297 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 11:29:38; For whatever it's worth, my run of approximately 250 feet of 3/4" CATV hardline measures (with an Autek RF-1) to have 1.6 dB of loss at 28 MHz - not nearly so good as the Handbook table says it shoul; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00781.html (8,692 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:03:55 -0500; -- Forwarded by Tyler G Stewart/BENN/CEC on 10/30/97 09:00 AM -- Tyler G Stewart 10/30/97 09:03 AM Remeasure it using a wattmeter and 75:50 ohm matching transformers and let me know what you get. I w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00786.html (9,766 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 10:09:56 -0500 (EST); << For whatever it's worth, my run of approximately 250 feet of 3/4" CATV hardline measures (with an Autek RF-1) to have 1.6 dB of loss at 28 MHz - not nearly so good as the Handbook table says it sh; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00790.html (8,318 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:40:47 -0500 (EST); Hey Pete.... That's an interesting finding.... I have come to trust my Autec, but your findings are far enough at odds with the accepted value for that type of cable to raise questions... Can you mea; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00797.html (8,111 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: wtill@bordercity.com (William Till); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:11:34 -0700; I'm no RF engineer, but I have over 40 years experience in ham radio and VHF sales/service, and I suspect that your instrument is lying to you. The true measure would be to put a wattmeter in the lin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00804.html (12,409 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart); Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 23:07:02 +0100; If he runs a KW and is actually losing 1.6 db in the connectors, they're going to get a bit warm! I suspect it's more a measurement problem... --Original Message-- From: TOMK5RC@aol.com <TOMK5RC@aol.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00807.html (9,389 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: donovanf@sgate.com (Frank Donovan); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:48:54 -0500 (EST); Pete, If each of your connectors actually have .6 dB loss, they should be getting red hot! Are they extremely hot when u use that antenna? 73 Frank W3LPL donovanf@sgate.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00809.html (8,864 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC); Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 09:30:01 EST; << > Good question, Tom -- I recall a discussion here where it was argued pretty persuasively that UHFs have virtually unmeasurable loss at HF - but my feeder has 1 UHF at the Amp, another at the bul; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00822.html (9,091 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: "Tom Hellem" <tomhellem@czo.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:41:30 -0500; I have three spool ends of 3/4" CATV hardline, the stuff with the rigid aluminum jacket. It was lying in a field for probably upwards of 10 years. When you look at the open end, the dielectric appear; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00533.html (7,498 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] CATV Hardline (score: 1): Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:13:35 -0700; Hello Tom, That stuff is getting harder to find. Used to be CATV companies locally gave free reign to hams locally to pick through the piles of spool ends; Now local CATV Comapnies often say no to ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00538.html (10,305 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]