Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CNT\s+400\s+flexible\s+coaxial\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+CNT\s+400\s+flexible\s+coaxial\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:15:04 -0300; Hello, I am looking for a flexible coaxial better than 9913 to feed yagis antennas. I know about CNT 400, but is rigid, so I´m afraid it will brake up in the balun antena because of the antenna rotat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00793.html (7,049 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:27:53 -0400; LMR400 uF is very low loss, and reasonably flexible. I use it for the rotator loops. Here's one source. http://www.davisrf.com/comm1/hardline.htm 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00802.html (7,957 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:39:01 +0000; Don't you mean LMR-400UF ? The more flexible version ? It has a stranded center conductor versus the regular solid. 73, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ ___________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00803.html (8,966 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:59:05 -0400; CNT400 and LMR 400 are pretty much comparable although I think the CNT is a bit more rigid based on experience between LMR250 and CNT250. I would use Buryflex for the rotator loops. It's rugged, flex; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00805.html (9,575 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:47:23 -0400; Ermmm, yes. I got all the characters other than the dash...... LMR400 uF vs LMR-400 UF 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00822.html (7,553 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy>; Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:52 -0300; Thanks for all you guys for answer to me, i much apreciated your suggestions. I found in internet a ExtraFlex at HYPERLINK "http://radioworks.com/ccoax.html"http://radioworks.com/ccoax.html that seem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00836.html (7,984 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] CNT 400 flexible coaxial? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:27:44 -0400; My view on the ExtraFlex at the link shown: In the images it appears to be very much like the old 9913 with the spiral dielectric which gives it a quasi air core. I had very poor luck with that type; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00847.html (9,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]