Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cable\s+working\s+load\/breaking\s+strength\.\.\.\/\/\/\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: Bill Winkis <kc4pe@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:48:16 -0500
My blueprint of my LM70 clearly states that the pull/down cable shall be ..3/16..7X19 and have a WORKING LOAD of 1400 pounds....most cable sold advertise a BREAKING STRENGTH ... And I am told the Wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00288.html (7,565 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:52:26 -0800
Maybe you're thinking of guy tensioning recommendations: 1/10th of rated capacity? For a hoist application, the mfr may have different recommendations. Engineering such things is a bit different (wha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00291.html (8,055 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:35:35 -0800
Bill, You might check up, but the recommended cable specification has changed on the LM-470. When I re-cabled mine the cable recommended by Tashjian was 1/4", now this is the bit I can't remember and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00295.html (8,866 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: Bill Winkis <kc4pe@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:54:03 -0500
*Here is what the folks at Amtec are saying... I use there cable grips... * *The broad application of AMTEC Grips on a wide variety of objects requires that adequate safety factors be used to establi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00298.html (9,670 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:41:17 -0800
Yep.. that's sort of what I was thinking.. each designer chooses what they want to use as a safety factor for each application. It covers things like material property uncertainty (e.g. was it a slig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00307.html (8,838 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Cable working load/breaking strength.../// (score: 1)
Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:03:05 -0500
I just happened to be checking a power winch/capstan website yesterday and read that the recommended cable for lifting is 5x the maximum load, and for pulling, I don't remember exactly but about 2 or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00342.html (6,795 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu