Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Calculations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Calculations\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Calculations (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:58:14 -0700; My accepted wind calcs reference IBC 2000 Wind load UBC Sec 1618 and UBC Tables 16. I am not sure but my Bldg Inspector seemed to think this was the same requirements as shown in UBC-97 but just cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00277.html (10,071 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Calculations (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:29:58 -0700; Hank, In regards to my comments on the subject, I have never mentioned a problem with the fees involved in obtaining the calcs, my only problem is why some manufacturers can provide them and others c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00279.html (13,473 bytes)
23. RE: [TowerTalk] Calculations (score: 1): Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:25:23 -0700; Alan: I find this interesting to say the least. The IBC never references the UBC it does reference the ASCE 7. In IBC 1609.1.1 which states that the wind loads are to be determined in accordance with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00281.html (12,188 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]