Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+SWR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Change\s+in\s+SWR\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Doug Scribner" <dscribner@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:24:10 -0500; I know, I probably should not get too hung up about this, but... Six weeks ago I finished my second tower... 66 feet of guyed Rohn 45. I have a Mosley Pro-67B @ 68 feet and an 80 Meter Inverted V, wi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00040.html (8,442 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:34:40 -0500 (EST); Doug, at that height, close to 1/2 wavelength, any and everything can effect the vswr of the 40m antenna. Even the moisture content of the soil will have an influence. Has it rained since the initial; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00041.html (9,177 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:37:17 -0600 (CST); is it pointed the same direction as when you made the initial measurement? how about significantly more rain, or dryness?? I know, I probably should not get too hung up about this, but... Six weeks a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00042.html (8,814 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0500; Were both measurements made with the SAME ORIENTATION of the yagi? Looks to me like the inverted V is interacting with the yagi, so orientation of the yagi would make a big difference. 73 Don N8DE I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00043.html (9,394 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Doug Scribner" <dscribner@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:29:26 -0500; Thanks for all the responses... To answer all the questions... Inverted V was up when I made the initial measurements Yagi was pointed at EU for both checks...I'm in the Northeast. Turning the antenn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00044.html (10,579 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:56:32 -0500 (EST); have a Mosley Pro-67B @ 68 feet and an 80 Meter Inverted V, with the apex at 64 feet. receive. It is 10 feet high with the feedpoint at the tower. it? I grounded the feedpoint of the dipole with no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00045.html (7,903 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Doug Scribner" <dscribner@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:04:47 -0500; Thanks Steve! Between your's and Gerald's comments, I definitely will drop the 160 Dipole and see what happens... And BTW, your past education on the Pro series being so sensitive has dissuaded me fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00046.html (9,108 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:34:49 -0500; Besides looking for the obvious changes of nearby objects or antenna direction, is anything in your feedline different such as coax or coax switches! When I connect a SixPak or StackMatch the SWR of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00048.html (9,278 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:43:05 -0800; Before investing any more time and money in the Moseley, I STRONGLY suggest that you buy and study the report by N0AX and K7LXC on a dozen or so tri-banders, including two Moseleys. The executive sum; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00056.html (8,742 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:51:14 -0700; Not sure what your hangup is about Mosley (if you 'dis it, at least spell the name right), but saying in general that they have less gain than a dipole is really stretching your credibility. I had a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00057.html (9,268 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Doug Scribner" <dscribner@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:30:05 -0500; GE, When I posted my question earlier I did not want this to become a debate as to the pros and cons of my Mosley. In fact I considered not mentioning it my name except that I wanted everyone to have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00058.html (11,777 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:37:42 -0800; On 12/3/2013 2:51 PM, Richard Solomon wrote: Not sure what your hangup is about Mosley (if you 'dis it, at least spell the name right), but saying in general that they have less gain than a dipole is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00060.html (9,118 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 02:02:43 +0100; Reading is believing? I am very happy that I own a Mosley beam CL33 and not a Moseley. But if identical yagis are meant, my dipoles probably have far less then one percent efficiency. 73 Peter Before; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00061.html (9,590 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:18:18 -0800; When I see good science presented from engineers I trust, I tend to believe it. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00062.html (8,781 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:24:41 -0500; I have no idea whether your Mosely performs well for it's boom length.or not. I have not read the N0AX/K7LXC report, however I believe that the antennas were assembled to the manufacture's specificat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00063.html (9,642 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:46:32 -0800; Right. Over a period of a year or so, I have 125 countries worked QRP. N6BT has often talked about working all continents in a relatively short period of time on a light bulb. 73, Jim K9YC __________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00064.html (8,496 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:58:22 -0700; Mosley Antenna's have been sold to the Government in somewhat large quantities. Having worked on Government Contracts the better part of 40 years, I am quite familiar with their procurement methods a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00065.html (11,477 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:00:43 -0500; Working a lot of countries is no indication of an antenna's performance. Right. Over a period of a year or so, I have 125 countries worked QRP. N6BT has often talked about working all continents in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00066.html (9,259 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 04:04:14 +0100; I did not see it but I am always very interested when I hear about yagi comparisons how they managed to measure the main lobes of the different antennas to be meaningful. So, how was that done? 73 Pe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00067.html (10,086 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR (score: 1): Author: jcjacobsen@q.com; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:28:05 -0500 (EST); Doug is having a problem with increasing SWR on a multiband yagi. A couple of "snip its" follow: <snip> This next part is WELL SAID DOUG!!!!! (see my post below) <End snip> everyone seems to forget a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00068.html (9,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]