Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Chrome\-moly\s+VS\:\s+steel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Chrome\-moly\s+VS\:\s+steel\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Chrome-moly VS: steel (score: 1): Author: "Mike Bragassa" <bragassa@consolidated.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:38:56 -0500; For you metallurgists in the group: Re: 20 ft mast pipe How does a 0.18 inch chromemoly pipe compare to a 0.25 inch schedule 80 pipe? 73, Mike, K5UO _______________________________________________ __; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00484.html (6,411 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Chrome-moly VS: steel (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:44:21 -0400; There are really two questions there combined into one question. Schedule 80 is a pipe wall thickness designation....It does not specify alloy - there are approximately 30+ alloy designations for pip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00485.html (10,687 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]