Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Clamp\s+Type\s+UHF\/PL\-259\s+Connectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Clamp\s+Type\s+UHF\/PL\-259\s+Connectors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Clamp Type UHF/PL-259 Connectors (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth Goodwin" <krgoodwin@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:50:51 -0600; I would caution that RG-213 and LMR400 are not the same when it comes to UHF connectors. I find that the connectors that require soldered center pins (which seems to be the preferred method being dis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00219.html (7,196 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Clamp Type UHF/PL-259 Connectors (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:05:00 -0500; Good observation, Ken and it's something I've struggled with since I began using LMR400. Also, the soldered clamp type UHF that I installed today would not accommodate LMR400 until I routed-out the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00220.html (8,317 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Clamp Type UHF/PL-259 Connectors (score: 1): Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:30:55 -0500; Joel at RF Connection www.therfc.com has them for sale. p/n UHF-RFC17-01C I bought ten for evaluation. Craig Radioware _______________________________________________ ________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00236.html (7,371 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Clamp Type UHF/PL-259 Connectors (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:19:08 -0500; Neat - I see they have the RFC17-01F-5for RG-58 -dunno if it will work on RG-8X but it's easy enough to ask. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00238.html (8,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]