Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Climbing\s+a\s+crank\-up\s+tower\s+when\s+nested\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alker <ka6ken@alker.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 07:34:38 -0700
Why would you never climb a crank-up when nested? I'm considering putting up a tower, and your comment made me curious. Thanks, Ken Al, I have a UST HDX-589. It tilts from the base. I installed my Or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00111.html (9,236 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: Phil <pmills7@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:41:14 -0500
I've done it but don't recommend it. First, all sections must be fully bottomed out....you don't want something shifting and trapping a foot. The main issue is that all the braces are Z-braces. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00112.html (10,231 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:20:02 +0000
Climbing a W braced crank up (Tri-ex/Tashian) is no different than any of the W braced fixed towers like T-15/T-20/T-26. Weird yes, but with climbing boots its not a problem. Just put some big pipes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00114.html (11,864 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:13:12 -0700
Ken, Crankups are notorious (or at least used to be) for settling to their own weight when cranked down, then settling just a little more with added weight of someone climbing on them. Tends to chop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00115.html (11,859 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 12:26:24 -0400
I have also climbed crank-up towers using the method K6MR described and to me it seemed easy and safe. Tilting can get complicated, especially with a large HF beam on top and even worse if the sectio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00116.html (8,113 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:38:13 -0700
John, Interesting. I like to tilt over my tower to have full access to all the elements and hardware of my DB42 while standing on the ground. I can even run back to the garage if I forgot a tool! If
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00117.html (8,733 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 17:14:04 +0000
Yep, I know it can happen. I knew a kid that had that happen just after getting his new crank up. We always called him Fingers from there after. I was in the antenna business (worked for a TriEx deal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00118.html (13,724 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing a crank-up tower when nested (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:10:55 -0700
Hey, we ALL have to be lucky to be still here. Yep, I know it can happen. I knew a kid that had that happen just after getting his new crank up. We always called him "Fingers" from there after. I was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-06/msg00119.html (15,173 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu