Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cloud\s+burners\s+and\s+height\,\s+some\s+comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cloud\s+burners\s+and\s+height\,\s+some\s+comments\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cloud burners and height, some comments (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:53:50 -0500; A few years ago I put up a 230 foot long horizontal loop fed with 600 ohm ladder line. It was roughly in the shape of a quasi trapezoid-rectangle and was ~ 25 feet up. I used it mostly on 80 and 40 m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00548.html (8,070 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cloud burners and height, some comments (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:06:48 -0500; 230 ft isn't long enough to resonate on 80 meters. In a trapezoidal shape it probably was resonant somewhere around 4.9 MHz. That means the SWR on 80 was high, but with good 600 ohm line the feedline; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00549.html (9,634 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]