Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Code\s+test\s+eliminated\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: w3qx@qsl.net
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:47:13 -0500
www.fcc.gov The first item offers downloads of the press release 30 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00535.html (7,751 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:54:43 -0500
This will generate lots of new questions about new antennas and towers for the thousands of new General Class licensees in 2007. Appears it is likely to be effective some time in January, perhaps ear
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00536.html (8,905 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc@pwrone.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:15:45 -0600
Breaker-one-nine Jim N9WW James Chaggaris President PowerOne Corp. 1020 Cedar Avenue Suite 110 St. Charles, IL 60174 Phn: 630-443-6500 Fax: 630-443-6505 Cell: 630-669-2241 www.pwrone.com --Original M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00537.html (9,691 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:53:17 -0600
As a HAM, I find your comment patently offensive. As a closely held national telecommunications infrastructure provider, I don't let it offend me, but I do tend to think twice about ever doing busine
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00542.html (11,041 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:29:29 -0800
That's a big 10-4 gud buddy. I hear you 'cause yer wall to wall and tree top tall!! 3's and 8's. Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00543.html (8,463 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:47:17 -0500
As a student of history I find your comment completely ignorant. The elimination of effective licensing requirements destroyed the Citizens Radio Service in the late 70's and early 80's. With US Ama
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00544.html (10,724 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Bob" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:21:52 -0800
"...patently offensive."? I cannot see how...or why. Perhaps you are just being too sensitive! Bob W7KD "May the Morse be with you!" _______________________________________________ __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00545.html (12,400 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc@pwrone.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:25:07 -0600
Joe: Thank you, my sentiments EXACTLY. 73's Jim N9WW James Chaggaris President PowerOne Corp. 1020 Cedar Avenue Suite 110 St. Charles, IL 60174 Phn: 630-443-6500 Fax: 630-443-6505 Cell: 630-669-2241
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00546.html (11,259 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:28:01 -0600
Gosh, as a ham, I don't. I thought it was a successful attempt at witty humor which I enjoyed, and it was appropriate under the circumstances. Mark, N5OT ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00547.html (8,292 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Jackson" <k9rz@radiks.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:58:05 -0600
For those of you who feel you must vent your spleen about this issue, please feel free to do so on QRZ.COM or eHAM.NET and spare the rest of us who are still more interested in discussing Towers and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00550.html (8,344 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:47:20 EST
As a closely held national telecommunications infrastructure provider, I don't let it offend me, but I do tend to think twice about ever doing business with a company that the president of sends out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00553.html (6,723 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:52:33 -0500
Look on the bright side. With all them CB'ers getting their tickets, ham radio equipment prices will drop. And think of all the channels we can make on the new 75 meter SSB band allocation. Seriously
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00554.html (13,137 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:58:11 -0600
Well Bob....tell me seriously why I would want an Extra more now than before?? Regards Dave Harmon NSRCA 586 K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. Look on the bright side. With all them CB'ers getti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00555.html (14,393 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:03:28 -0500
Our Radio Club (www.w4ava.org) will continue supporting teaching the Morse code. What is the difference if someone is forced to learn the code to get their license then never uses it again after the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00556.html (8,207 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:09:47 -0600
Perhaps, and thank you for an intelligent reply. Being stuck in Philly for 20 hours for fog, and then a cramped flight home may have put me a bit touchy. Just got in less than an hour before email. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00558.html (9,733 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: EL34GUY@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:43:23 EST
Im glad they dropped it, I got 13wpm cw 20 years ago and have had 5 cw qso's total in my life. I just never cared to use it. Just my preference I guess. I know some decent guys that this will open up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00561.html (7,849 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge" <unclebudd@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:18:14 -0600
Dave, As an Advanced ticket holder, I have for years considered upgrading to Extra. Now the recent FCC change will inevitably bring more hams into our ranks and the "General Sections" of the bands ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00562.html (14,267 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:14:18 -0600
Like someone else said....I don't believe that there is going to be a stampede to the ham bands just because a 5 wpm test has been eliminated. I have yet to actually meet someone who has not got a ti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00564.html (15,879 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: Chuck <wcmoore@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:27:13 -0600 (CST)
--What is the difference if someone is forced to learn the code to get their license then never uses it again after they pass the test or dropping the requirement and letting those who find the commu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00565.html (8,432 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:36:12 -0500
Yes, the discipline to learn CW at 20 WPM 30 plus years ago when I hated it made me a far better operator, ham, and person than the ability to memorize my way to an Extra class license as it would b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00569.html (8,191 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu