Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Common\s+Mode\s+Interference\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Common\s+Mode\s+Interference\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Common Mode Interference (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:54:30 -0700; I am still learning how to deal with common mode interference, and I am still very much a work in progress :-) Below are two sites with info on this subject that some of you may not be aware of. Firs; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00289.html (9,025 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Common Mode Interference (score: 1): Author: charlie@thegallos.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:43:16 -0400; <snip> <snip> I always love the stuff that talks about "small lot" - what most of these guys call a small lot I call acreage - I live in NYC - 42x100 is a average lot in my area. Small - hahahah ____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00291.html (8,714 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Common Mode Interference (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:26:14 -0700; On 4/20/16 12:43 PM, charlie@thegallos.com wrote: <snip> Also, take a look at the extensive common mode noise mitigation work done by N4IS. His work illuminates what Jim talks about. (Very interestin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00293.html (10,282 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Common Mode Interference (score: 1): Author: charlie@thegallos.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:45:18 -0400; 30-40 x <snip> Sounds exactly the same as here with lots between 40-42 feet by 98-102, depending Kinda lucky with the 42 ft width, as I can JUST swing a D-140 40m rotary dipole, with 6 inches to spa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00302.html (9,168 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]