Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crank\-up\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crank\-up\s+towers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Crank-up towers (score: 1): Author: kfath@bellsouth.net (kfath@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:14:04 -0400; I am sure this has been discussed frequently in the past, but I have been off the reflector for about a year. I am in the process of putting up a tower. I am limited to self supporting or crank up by; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00449.html (8,238 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Crank-up towers (score: 1): Author: rgagos@home.com (Roger Gagos); Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 23:33:08 -0700; Last weekend I attended a workshop at the ARRL Southwestern Division Convention given by Tom Schiller, N6BT, President of Force 12. He discussed many things but antenna height vs. radiation angle was; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00454.html (9,071 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Crank-up towers (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 18:40:50 -0600; My experience is that 80 to 100 ft plays very well AFTER DARK from 10 thru 40M but LOWER is BETTER during DAYLIGHT HOURS on the high bands. NO SINGLE HEIGHT will cover ALL the angles supported by the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00532.html (9,844 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Crank-up towers (score: 1): Author: "Pat Chiles" <chilesp@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 19:33:14 -0400; I have US Tower 555HDX. It has a TH7 2 feet above the top of the tower and a Cushcraft XM240 about 12 feet above that. I installed both of these antennas myself without my feet barely left the ground; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00101.html (7,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]