Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crossfield\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Crossfield\s+Antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 1): Author: Charles Engman <charles.engman@L-3Com.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:01:06 -0800; Nothing wrong with experimenting. The explanation of the physics of how that thing works is a matter for debate. In real terms, dinky (with respect to wavelength) antennas are not efficient and do no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00313.html (7,255 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:32:39 -0500; are not efficient quarter or half wave Capture area is a product of gain and wavelength, not physical antenna size. Always important to remember that!! If you have an antenna 500 feet long on 20 met; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00317.html (7,825 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:06:11 +0000; Cable radiation, anyone? I've yet to see a review of a CFA/EH that demonstrated the reviewer understood that possibility, took serious precautions against it, and then measured it. Lacking all that,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00328.html (8,452 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:35:26 -0500; reviewer against it, and could be Actually Ted Hart, who claims to be the inventor of the EH antenna, gave a stern warning to never use common mode chokes on the feedline of EH antennas because it s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00330.html (8,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]