Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+4\s+square\s+active\s+antenna\s+receive\s+system\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+DX\s+Engineering\s+4\s+square\s+active\s+antenna\s+receive\s+system\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 4 square active antenna receive system (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:24:48 -0600; Has anyone had any experience with this system? Other than being able to select more directions, would this array out perform a 560 ft beverage on 160 and 80 in the desired direction? I have not read; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00057.html (7,145 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 4 square active antenna receive system (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:07:46 -0700; I found that a four element vertical array had essentially identical performance to my 560 ft beverage on 80 and 160. I have two of the DX Engineering ARAH-1 active receive antennas for sale. They ca; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00071.html (9,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]