Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Designing\s+a\s+\"receiving\s+cradle\"\s+or\s+jack\s+stand\s+for\s+my\s+HDX\s+572MD\s+US\s+Towers\s+tilt\s+over\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Designing\s+a\s+\"receiving\s+cradle\"\s+or\s+jack\s+stand\s+for\s+my\s+HDX\s+572MD\s+US\s+Towers\s+tilt\s+over\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Designing a "receiving cradle" or jack stand for my HDX 572MD US Towers tilt over (score: 1): Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:23:20 -0500; FWIW: I have a UST 55' crank up, tilt over with a 3 element SteppIR on it. I only crank it down for maintenance, so your situation may be different. My standoff arms are in alignment; coax is not att; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00213.html (10,236 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Designing a "receiving cradle" or jack stand for my HDX 572MD US Towers tilt over (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:22:33 -0800; For safety reasons, it seems like a good idea to support a laid over tower by more than the erecting cable when working on it. One reason is the erecting system load (mast and cable) is the highest w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-12/msg00222.html (10,748 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]