Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elementary\s+feedline\s+loss\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Elementary\s+feedline\s+loss\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Elementary feedline loss question (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 09:53:55 -0400; If I terminate a long 50-ohm coaxial cable with a 50-ohm dummy load, and put an MFJ-259B on the other end, and it reads R=56, X=0 at a given frequency, what is the mathematical relationship between t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00055.html (6,979 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Elementary feedline loss question (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:06:45 +0000; Well... if it is just cable loss and the cable is uniform the R should approach Z0 as the length increases no matter what the load is... the less loss the slower the approach to Z0. If the cable is t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00060.html (9,202 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Elementary feedline loss question (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:31:02 -0700; Perhaps a less error prone way to measure loss is to use your transmitter, dummy load, and SWR/power meter. I put the power meter at the transmitter and set the power level on the SWR meter. Then mov; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00069.html (8,769 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Elementary feedline loss question (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:02:10 +0100; Here's a method I use: Terminate the line with a short circuit. At the other end of the line use the analyser to find the frequencies where the line impedance is lowest resistance and zero reactance; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00075.html (8,961 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]