Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+\[towertalk\]\s+Beverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+\[towertalk\]\s+Beverage\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: [towertalk] Beverage (score: 1): Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:09:14 -0600; Well put John - I only want to reiterate your observations - inexpensive, easy to build out of a variety of parts, mostly forgiving, and usually quite effective. Matt KM5VI It really does not take mu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00139.html (8,841 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: [towertalk] Beverage (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:51:10 -0600; I've had both; there's not much of a comparison. If you want a directional low noise antenna, the bev is a far better choice than the loop, even if it's relatively short. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com al; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00140.html (9,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]